State rep to Anna Maria: HB883 won’t be repealed

State Rep. Jim Boyd, R-Bradenton, said June 27 at an Anna Maria city meeting that he doesn’t hold out a lot of hope the 2011 passage of HB883 restricting some rights by local government to regulate rental units would be repealed any time soon.

Boyd, who voted along with 93 other state representatives to pass the bill, said the 2011 debate over the measure was more about individual property rights.

Boyd said he received calls about the bill, and those he did receive were supportive of its passage.

“I had folks from this island tell me their property has been in their family for 50 years and the only way they could keep it is to let them rent it how and when they wanted,” said Boyd. “They said if they couldn’t, high property taxes and high utilities would force them to sell their family home.”

Anna Maria Mayor SueLynn said the law limits how cities deal with vacation rentals. “What that has done is tie our hands. It feels like a taking of our own home rule. It’s had a tremendous impact in Anna Maria,” she said.

SueLynn said longtime residents are moving away and neighborhoods are being lost.

“It’s decimated our quality of life,” she said.

Boyd said the only way to attempt a repeal is to create a new bill to readdress the issue, but he said that would be an uphill climb given the bill’s overwhelming support.

HB883 passed in the House 94-19, but local municipalities claim powerful backers in the development and real estate industries, who managed to get it to a vote, promoted the law.

City officials on Anna Maria Island have previously said they were unaware of the bill until after it passed.

Boyd said there are other ways to address it.

“It could be introduced in terms of an amendment, if that is the will of the community,” he said. “But there are limitations.”

SueLynn said Anna Maria, other island cities and a growing number of inland cities are gearing up to fight the bill.

Boyd said public support against the bill would be key for those representing their constituents.

“I’m an optimist by nature,” he said. “But I can just about guarantee it won’t be repealed. There might be a way to look at an individual community, and I’m happy to advance that conversation.”

Anna Maria Commissioner Gene Aubry said the statute benefits investors over residents and, during recent discussion, the city learned property owners can sue under the Bert J. Harris Jr. Act — an even worse-case scenario.

“The people really hurt by this law are the people that live here,” said Aubry. “The people doing fine are the investors. That bill is destroying every city on the waterfront.”

Aubry noted the commission then learned of the Bert Harris Act, “so if you build a box and the city tries to do something about it, the guy trying to make money has the right to sue the city.”

Boyd, who grew up on Anna Maria Island, acknowledged that investors are changing the character of the city, “in that they don’t care what the community looks like and are only interested in making money.”

Commissioner Dale Woodland said increased rentals create increased expenses for a city that now has no ability to regulate vacation units.

“We have had such an increase of visitors,” he said. “Many of them are coming to vacation rentals and hurting our infrastructure. You have totally tied our hands. The only way to deal with that increase is to raise taxes on the people who live here. That is wrong. They shouldn’t have to pay more for the damage being done by visitors.”

That sparked a conversation about the Manatee County Tourist Development Council and the restrictions placed on the TDC by state statutes that limit its funding — the collection of a tax on accommodation rentals of six months or less — to tourism-related spending.

SueLynn has been actively lobbying to attain some of the TDC funding for city infrastructure needs.

Woodland said if Anna Maria received 5 percent of its own bed tax, “we could lower taxes.”

Boyd said city officials should begin working with other agencies on trying to change how the TDC can spend its money, but that he would address the problems HB883 has created for the island.

“I will work with staff when I get back and try to work the problem,” he said.

Boyd said, otherwise, the 2013 legislative session was productive and that Democrats and Republicans worked well together in passing election reform, ethics reform and campaign finance reform.

He said the new laws would ensure Florida elections are productive and ethics reform will better hold elected officials accountable morally and financially.

“Some elected officials have outstanding fines for three, four or five years,” he said. “We are talking about a lot of money so we extended the statute of limitations from four years to 20 years. I hope that puts us in a better light to the public.”

Education, fire safety and beach renourishment funding were all things Boyd said were improved upon during the recent session.

“Everything we were able to accomplish in these areas was the right things to do for Florida,” he said.

7 thoughts on “State rep to Anna Maria: HB883 won’t be repealed

  1. George

    I have been visiting Anna Maria for nearly 10 years and am getting worried that the island paradise i once knew is changing to fast with huge buildings replacing typical island homes.
    I do not wish to join in personal arguments but pray that a compromise can be reached to prevent over development, tourism has a place in the Island economy but not at the expense of the local community.
    I wish all you true island folks the very best for the future and look forward to my next visit in the Spring next year when hopefully a resolution has been found.

  2. island charm

    I’ve loved anna maria since the 70’s. The sleepy island community has been wiped away by real estate developers (in it for the $$$) and family homes turned into big dollar rentals. I’m all for regulating it and hope they can squash the over promoting and over selling of this lovely town that has happened in recent years.

  3. Margaret

    To Ben Hardin and his ilk-
    People like you who are here first and foremost to make money should get out, you have no business being here. This was a real community – where is your conscience? I hope your town experiences the same hell – and that the epicenter is right next door to where you live. Go find another rock.

  4. wrong

    No Ben, the problem is not over-regulating municipalities, the problem is outside investors looking to make a buck who are ruining communities where people live full time. The actual residents who have the ability to vote and control their own city need to pass measures to take control back of the city. This island was not designed to support the influx of people and the infrastructure will never safely support this number of tourists. Short term rentals need to be reigned in and regulated so that the full time residents are not the losers while the non residents along with a handful of business and restaurant owners reap all the benefits.

  5. Ben Hardin

    Huge win for property rights. Only necessary because of over-regulating municipalities, like Anna Maria. May need to call SueLynn a Wambulance. If one does not like rentals, perhaps he/she should not live on a vacation island.

    1. Marsha Bard

      I’m rather tired of the newer folks coming to the island telling long term residents (I’ve been here for 27yrs) that if they don’t like a vacation island that they should move. I was here first! If you don’t like the regulations you are free to move elsewhere. I’m all for Sue Lynn and all of the commissioners who are trying to keep limit this island to a slow growth.

      1. Ben Hardin

        No, Marsha, it is not first here rules. I have been coming to the island all my life and have owned my home for over 13 years. I have never made a dime off renting property on the island, and have no intent to do so. I am simply sick and tired of over-regulation and destruction of property rights by pompous idiots like you that think they have superior rights to others. I pay taxes (probably more than you) and support business, tourism, and fun. That is what AMI is about. It has always been a vacation island and always will be. Finally, your concern for growth makes no sense. Where on the island do you believe growth will occur? Thank God our legislature disagrees with you.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *