Cortez megabridge opponents face tick, tick, ticking clock

thumb image
The DOT plan for the 65-foot fixed bridge landing area in Cortez. Islander Courtesy Graphic
Longtime Cortez resident Plum Taylor believes a big bridge would destroy the character of the fishing village. Islander Photo: Sarah Brice
DOT District 1 Secretary LK Nandam says the transportation agency would not do anything to harm the character of a community. Islander Photo: Sarah Brice
Kaye Bell, president of the Cortez Cultural Center, says Cortez has been able to maintain its character because no large developments have been able to come in. Islander Photo: Sarah Brice

Opponents of the Cortez Road megabridge proposed by the Florida Department of Transportation may be running out of time.

The DOT has said it expects to release results of its Cortez Bridge Project Development and Environment Study by the end of the year. One transportation authority told The Islander it could be much sooner.

Once the PD&E study is released, the DOT can move ahead with a $6.4 million design contract with the engineering firm H.W. Lochner Inc.

And once design work begins, it may be difficult for opponents to stop the momentum toward construction of the 65-foot-clearance fixed span the DOT said it wants to replace the 62-year-old Cortez Bridge.

“Once they get so far down a road, it’s harder to make changes,” David Hutchinson, executive director of the Sarasota/Manatee Planning Organization, said Sept. 26.

Still, some megabridge opponents believe they have time.

“Our hands are not tied to determine the height,” Manatee County Commissioner Carol Whitmore told fellow board members at an Aug. 20 meeting. “It’s not too late to meet with the DOT to determine the height.”

Bradenton Beach Mayor John Chappie, who also opposes the big bridge, is not so sure.

“That’s a good question,” he told The Islander Oct. 3 when asked if there is sufficient time to change the plans. “I don’t know. They could say let’s stop and reconsider. That’s what we’re hoping for.”

Despite DOT public hearings in 2014, 2016 and 2017 and the agency’s announcement in April 2018 that the high fixed span would replace the bascule bridge, official opposition didn’t begin to solidify until Whitmore spoke to the other six commissioners at their board meeting and asked for support.

She did not get it.

But she did get support in mid-September from the Island Transportation Planning Organization, which consists of the three mayors on Anna Maria Island. The ITPO passed a measure to support Whitmore’s proposed compromise of a 45-foot drawbridge.

Bradenton Beach Mayor John Chappie and Holmes Beach Mayor Judy Titsworth voted in favor of the motion. Anna Maria Mayor Dan Murphy, who did not attend the ITPO meeting, followed up a week later with a letter to DOT District Secretary L.K. Nandam saying his city also opposes the high bridge.

“This project will not only negatively impact residents and property owners in Cortez village, but on our island community as well,” Murphy wrote.

The Bradenton Beach City Commission passed a resolution Oct. 3 supporting Chappie’s efforts to work toward alternatives to the 65-foot-clearance bridge.

The mayor said he will pass along the city’s opposition to local legislators in Tallahassee.

“There’s really not a whole lot we can do,” he said.  “I’ll let them know once again.”

The Holmes Beach City Commission has voted to draft a letter in support of Whitmore’s compromise.

The strongest opposition, though, comes from Cortez residents, who have spent decades fighting DOT efforts to build a high bridge. These opponents maintain a big bridge would permanently damage the character of Cortez, which was designated a U.S. historic district in 1995, largely due to the grass-roots efforts of longtime residents Linda Molto and Mary Fulford Green.

“Oh, my Lord, if that big old bridge comes in here, it would destroy Cortez,” said Plum Taylor, 85, who has lived in the fishing village since 1952. Her late husband’s family was one of the original five families to settle Cortez in the 1890s.

“Cortez remains quaint because nothing big has been able to come in,” said Kaye Bell, 78, president of the Cortez Cultural Center.

Nandam told The Islander Sept. 23 that community input is part of the PD&E process.

“We would not pick a design of a bridge that would be damaging to any community,” he said. “Our mission is community success.”

The fight over the Cortez Bridge dates to 1989, when the DOT announced it would build a 65-foot-clearance fixed span to replace the 1957 drawbridge.

Public outcry led the DOT to abandon its plans to replace the bridge in the early1990s.

The agency instead turned its attention to the Anna Maria Island Bridge, with plans for a 65-foot-clearance fixed span, same as it had wanted for Cortez.

More than 70 opponents formed a grass-roots organization called Save Anna Maria Inc. in 1993 and won a lawsuit in 1997 that halted plans for the bridge over environmental concerns, including seagrass destruction.

All was quiet for a few years, but the DOT came back with a study in 2010 that determined the Anna Maria Island Bridge would have no significant impact on such factors as natural resources and wildlife. The Federal Highway Administration approved the study in 2016.

SAM disbanded in October 2017.

The prevailing belief among local officials and some activists was that the DOT would build a high span to replace the Anna Maria Island Bridge and retain the Cortez Bridge or replace it with a similar bascule bridge.

That belief turned out to be wrong.

The DOT began its PD&E study for the Cortez Bridge in 2013 and announced five years later it would build the 65-foot-clearance bridge.

Longtime Cortez resident Molto said she was not surprised.

“We had a feeling it would come back,” she told The Islander in August. “We know the DOT. We just know them. Because we dealt with them before, we know who they are.”

Molto said the anti-bridge efforts are just getting started, haltingly. Many of the old-timers have died, she said, and many of the young people from that era have moved away.

Opponents now face a ticking clock.

Once design begins, it will take at least two years to complete, DOT spokesman Brian R. Rick told The Islander in August. The DOT likely will hold public meetings during that period, Rick said.

After that would come right-of-way acquisition, then construction.

Rick said right-of-way acquisition is expected to be funded for fiscal years 2024-27, beyond the scope of the DOT’s current five-year work program, which ends in 2024.

Construction also is not funded.

That timetable gives opponents hope that it’s not too late.

“I have nothing against the DOT,” Whitmore told the ITPO at its Sept. 16 meeting, “but I know we can still change it.

“This is our last chance, truthfully, in my lifetime and your lifetime that we can protect the village of Cortez.”


More from The Islander

5 thoughts on “Cortez megabridge opponents face tick, tick, ticking clock

  1. Alvin

    As a property owner on Anna Marie island
    I think there definitely needs a better travel time going and coming from the island
    From 10 am to noon on the busy months u can wait in line hrs
    Maybe the solution would b to minimize outside tourist and only have the residents and vacation renters on the island
    The outside people coming to visit island and dont have a home or rental need to pay a fee if they wanna go across bridge

  2. Roar Lien

    These two quotes confound me:

    “Oh, my Lord, if that big old bridge comes in here, it would destroy Cortez,”
    “Cortez remains quaint because nothing big has been able to come in,”

    I don’t understand how a brand new bridge that will eliminate backups by eliminating draw bridge openings is going to destroy Cortez, or bring in huge developments. The obstacles to development of land, to redevelopment of existing businesses will not inherently or materially be altered with a new bridge. The obstacles already exist today, lack of available land and lack of the ability to treat stormwater runoff. You won’t see a Racetrac swoop in because there is no viable land. Could you please go more in depth with what these folks mean by “Destroy” ? How exactly would a brand new bridge destroy an historic fishing village? Look at the graphic. What exactly is being destroyed.

    And secondly Brice, the land in the northeast section is proposed for over 86 short-term renal units, not a typo, 86 short-term rental units are slated for that Hunter’s Point parcel. Where is your moral outrage sir, where is your klaxon? Why aren’t you guys in the streets with pitchforks over a development that will in fact destroy Cortez. You’re going to have rich out of town tourists creating traffic headaches, crowding our beaches, consuming water and spending their tourist dollars not in Cortez. I question your intellectual sincerity, Mr Brice.

    1. Bonner Joy

      Intellectual sincerity? That’s a new one. In fact, we — The Islander — report the news. We don’t run into the streets with pitchforks. We don’t make up the news. If the people in the village (mostly the south side of Cortez Road) say the character of Cortez is at stake if a large ramp (for egress and ingress to the bridge) covers businesses and causes the DOT to build loops and access roads through the village — as they say, it may indeed destroy the historic character of the village. And there are 150+ homes in the village on the federal registry of historic places.Do some homework. Review the plan for Cortez. Educate first. — Bonner Joy

Comments are closed.